If a movie depicts gratuitous smoking, do you think that should be enough to get it rated higher?
+8
Supernova
captainbryce
Shale
Nystyle709
Forgiveness Man
Alan Smithee
CeCe
Marc™
12 posters
Should Films Depicting Smoking Affect Their MPAA Rating?
Marc™- …is a Chamber DEITY.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Michigan
Posts : 12006
Rep : 212
CeCe- …is a Chamber DEITY.
- Join date : 2010-06-30
Posts : 11962
Rep : 326
Not at all.
Alan Smithee- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-09-03
Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
Posts : 25792
Rep : 381
No
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
Eh, only if it's a G film being turned into a PG film. Beyond that, raising the rating cause of smoking seems a bit dumb.
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
Nope.
Shale- ...is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-09-27
Location : Miami Beach
Posts : 9699
Rep : 219
No.
I see some films with subtle (and not so subtle) messages on social conduct. It would be nice in this world where less than 25% of the ppl have this despicable, nasty habit today that it is reflected in modern film. Smoking is a good prop for the villains and neurotics portrayed on-screen and the decent, well-adjusted ppl not smoking.
Also, how would we do a period piece set in the 1950s without EVERYONE smoking, including doctors in their office. That was a horrible time for lungs that I survived (so far). It would be completely unreal not to portray that onscreen.
I see some films with subtle (and not so subtle) messages on social conduct. It would be nice in this world where less than 25% of the ppl have this despicable, nasty habit today that it is reflected in modern film. Smoking is a good prop for the villains and neurotics portrayed on-screen and the decent, well-adjusted ppl not smoking.
Also, how would we do a period piece set in the 1950s without EVERYONE smoking, including doctors in their office. That was a horrible time for lungs that I survived (so far). It would be completely unreal not to portray that onscreen.
captainbryce- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-04-11
Location : California
Posts : 2051
Rep : 127
Unless they are smoking something "illegal" I would say no.
Supernova- The Book Chamber
Join date : 2010-06-22
Posts : 11954
Rep : 182
Simply put: F-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-ck no.
For crying out loud, you can find smoking in most cartoons, Pink Panther, The Flintstones, the Jetsons, what are we going to rerate them for more mature audiences too? And if we're seriously going to raise the viewing age on stuff for smoking, then shouldn't films depicting consumption of alcohol be made into R rated movies since you have to be 21 to do that?
For crying out loud, you can find smoking in most cartoons, Pink Panther, The Flintstones, the Jetsons, what are we going to rerate them for more mature audiences too? And if we're seriously going to raise the viewing age on stuff for smoking, then shouldn't films depicting consumption of alcohol be made into R rated movies since you have to be 21 to do that?
Jason B.- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-11
Posts : 2967
Rep : 70
Anti-smoking groups have been lobbying for YEARS to get the MPAA to sanction films that depict smoking or at least up their rating. IMO overzealous but no more than TV outright banning cigarette commercials.
Supernova- The Book Chamber
Join date : 2010-06-22
Posts : 11954
Rep : 182
Jason B. wrote:Anti-smoking groups have been lobbying for YEARS to get the MPAA to sanction films that depict smoking or at least up their rating. IMO overzealous but no more than TV outright banning cigarette commercials.
I think it is, commercials are made to advertise and sell a product, movies are made to tell a story, they may have product placement in some films but very rarely are they trying to tell the audience go out and buy this brand of cigarettes, they just smoke whatever the hell they do, they don't specify what brand, what filters, what flavors, etc. Not that it matters anyway, even without cigarette commercials, millions of people spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year on cigarettes and chewing tobacco anyway. If the product is really good, or just already has a big buying market, they really don't need TV ads to help them along. I mean if tomorrow there were no more ads for Reese's peanut butter cups, does anybody believe the sales of them would go down? No, everybody knows what they are, how good they are and where to get them, same thing for smokers and their cigarettes.
JM130ELM- …is Necessary.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Location : Chicago
Posts : 661
Rep : 32
No.
Cheaps- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-11-17
Posts : 25876
Rep : 252
No
Tony Marino- …is a Global Moderator.
Join date : 2010-01-31
Location : New York
Posts : 26786
Rep : 607
Hell no that would be just plain stupid.
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:17 am by Chris
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:16 am by Chris
» New project
Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:17 am by wants2laugh
» st pattys day
Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:21 am by Bluesmama
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:11 pm by wants2laugh
» Red?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:05 pm by Alan Smithee
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:57 pm by wants2laugh
» Canned Foods
Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:57 pm by CeCe
» English Muffins or Toast?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:45 pm by Nystyle709