Octomom Going on Welfare

Choices have consequences.

That's what Nadya "Octomom" Suleman is finding out -- the hard way.

After gaining notoriety for going full-term with eight children, to add to the six children she already had, the unmarried Suleman is now almost completely broke, and ready to go on welfare, RadarOnline.com reports.

"She's going on welfare and it's going to be very soon," an insider told the web site. "There's just no choice. She's running out of money and those kids need to eat."

The money Octomom made selling access to her life is almost all gone, and reality TV and book deals have not panned out, the web site says.

Behind on house payments and without any real source of income, sources tell Radaronline.com that Suleman's only choice is to go on the dole.

"She needs the money. She has no choice at this point," the source said. "And she's been on public assistance before."

Suleman, 35, lives in a house that her father bought her, but she has fallen behind on payments, the site reports.

Suleman gained international fame after giving birth to her octuplets on January 29, 2009.

RedBedroom wrote:Those kids are going to never go unfed. Reality TV is gonna be there for this bitch before any of us would be afforded the chance to tout our kid as the next best thing...not that we would...just sayin'...

CatEyes10736 wrote:^ Haha. I was thinking the same thing. Outlaw abortion. Outlaw the pill. Supporting this woman and her 14 kids with our tax dollars should be fun, right Forgiveness?!

Forgiveness_Man wrote:

So we kill people to save our country money? Yeah, that's not barbaric.

But I'm going to shut you little abortionists down this time. You all swing and REALLY missed. (This is actually proving to MY point, not yours) Women don't get pregnant with 8 kids without some kind of artificial help. Octomom didn't just get laid one night and wound up carrying 8 kids. She went to a clinic and got herself super inseminated with kids after she already had 6. These 14 kids would've been here with or without abortion(although I am glad you think we should kill people who are burdensome to society. Maybe we can target the old people not working next), cause this woman has a few screws loose and decided to just crank out kids without having a job or a man. This is why I am against IVF. If you have kids the natural way, you don't typically have 8 kids at once.

So sorry you little abortionists, but you missed the mark on this one. I do not support what Octomom does. Now that doesn't mean we should be killing her children. But the way she got them I feel immoral and I am sitting back and smiling at the consequences cause it really just proves MY point.(I also hate welfare so it kind if is a double point for me)

Sorry, but you'll never be able to use financial burden to justify abortion to me. Especially in this case when abortion is clearly not in the equation at all. Seriously, how is abortion even in THIS debate? This is an IVF debate all the way.

Nystyle709 wrote:

LMAO. You tried. First of all, my declaration was tongue in cheek. Cateyes comment was sarcasm. Because there ARE people who keeping having multiple children WITHOUT having the financial means to take care of them. The Octomom is obviously batshit crazy and what she did is disgraceful but she's an isolated incident. CLEARLY you have a woman who had no fucking means to take care of the six children she already had (which of those she could've aborted) and went ahead and had MORE. Now she gotta go on welfare. Which is the case with alot of welfare moms who don't believe in abortion (lol) and ridiculously obviously don't believe in birth control so the burden of taking care of the kids falls on ME and I don't even know the bitch. Don't get me wrong, I really don't hate welfare if it's used a stepping stone. A woman with two kids on welfare, not that big of a deal....you can let it slide. MULTIPLE children? Three, four, five, six and FOURTEEN? Nah. So yeah, that's exactly what the previous comments referred to. Looks like you failed to catch the ball. An embryo grows for a reason. Until it can survive outside of the womb, it's not a damn baby. You have no idea when it becomes sentient, if it does at all. Feeling-less cells, that's what an embryo is.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:I got that you were being sarcastic. You are perpetual sarcasm. Everything you say is angry or flaming at me.

You seriously think I care that much? Seriously? Sweetheart, I have NEVER been angry or flaming at you. I don't give a damn about you. You're somebody in cyberspace who posts on the same forum that I happen to post on. You're somebody who, judging by your posts, has wretched thinking, extremely old fashioned and prehistoric views and your lame posts are just BEGGING to be called out on. So I do it. I don't agree with you 99% of the shit you say on here and I say so. What, you think because I swear when I debate means I'm insulting you? That I'm actually getting upset? I like to curse. So get over it. When I sign off of this message board, I go on and live my life. You are NEVER a thought. So get the fuck off your soapbox thinking someone is insulting you all the time. I find it extremely interesting how you do the same exact things you accuse others of. Can't take the heat, then get the fuck out of the kitchen. ('')

You don't discuss anything without insulting me so I've learned that everything you say is sarcasm.

Considering Octomom IS the TOPIC, I wasn't bothering to discuss some grand statement about mothers on wellfare.

Sorry, but I do know when it's sentient.

Reality just isn't on your side.

It IS a damn baby. And I find it quite barbaric that you suggest that we kill babies to save some money.

But you missed the ball too. MILLIONS of babies are aborted every year in this country.

Women who have babies CHOSE to. Octomom chose to get inseminated with 14 kids. Abortion isn't a factor in her case. All of her kids are IVF. I don't like paying for mothers cranking out kids on welfare either. But my solution is that the women simply close their legs if they can't afford a kid(or be barred from the IVF clinic). Once they have the kid, I don't support ripping it out in pieces under the guise of saving money. I mean shooting everybody on welfare would get them off welfare; you wouldn't be paying for them anymore. Again, just because there is a problem doesn't make anything offered as a solution sensible. Abortion isn't the answer to welfare abuse.

As for Octomom, again, abortion isn't even related to her. She CHOSE to go get inseminated with 14 kids.(Pro-Choice, her body, her choice. She wanted 14 kids in her body without a daddy. She got it.) This is about IVF, not abortion.

Nystyle709 wrote:Cut for spacer

Forgiveness_Man wrote:
You've never flamed at me?

Oh yeah, I did call you stupid in the thread about the Mosque didn't I? But what you wrote was stupid, so that really wasn't an insult. ('') Like I said, if you really want me to insult you....say the word.

So somebody hacked your account then? I see. Too bad your sarcasm is predictable. I never make myself look ridiculous. That is just the default insult you come up with when you know that I'm right.

Prove it? Look at a modern sonogram. Look at the Science of these babies having everything that makes them genetically human and not something else. I mean yeah, you'll probably say it doesn't look human to you but of course people who support killing somebody else rarely do see their victims as human beings. If it's not sentient at that age, why don't you prove the exact moment when it does become sentient, cause if it isn't at conception there must be a magic moment at some course during the 9 months. Tell me when that magic moment is.

I live in the 21st century too. I just don't act like the 21st century erases the truth established before it. In other words, I acknowledge that this isn't year 1 and truth doesn't rewrite itself to suit modern convenience. It is common sense, and since that baby is scientifically living, it IS killing it. Non-living things don't suck thumbs. Saying it isn't alive is just the killers rationalizing their kills. And I consider it my damn business when people are being murdered because somebody else doesn't consider them human enough.

I am morally against birth control. If somebody else wants to use it, that's their biz. And don't give me the "nature" of a human being to have sex. That is just degrading to think that people cannot exercise any self control. It's in the nature of human beings to eat too yet we try to tell people what to eat and when. (And it does negate what you said.)

Having said that, I am sort of done with you Snappy. Find a new guy to chase after. Tired of the circles with you.