Woman Gets 20 Years For Sexually Abusing Daughter On Webcam

• Julie Carr made shocking films for British teenager
  
• Videos uncovered in U.K. led to arrest in America
  
• Victim picked because 'she was the cutest'
  

A woman who performed sex acts on her own 2-year-old girl while a
man in the United Kingdom watched live via a web-cam has been sentenced
to 20 years in prison.

Julie Carr, 33, from Maine, has been sentenced a year after confessing that she recorded the videos for the teenager.

Summing up the case, U.S. District Judge John Woodcock said he had
dealt with many child pornography cases and 'yours is the worst case
I've ever seen.'



Monsters:
Julie Carr (left) admitted to performing sex acts on a 2-year-old while
teenage Nicholas Wilde watched in Britain. He is seen defiantly
gesturing to the camera at his 2010 sentencing[/right]




The Bangor Daily News said when she pleaded guilty in February
2010, Carr admitted making four live videos of herself performing sex
acts on her youngest daughter.

Sentencing her yesterday, Judge Woodcock said: 'What you have done, Ms.
Carr, is violate the most basic bond of society, the bond between a
mother and her child, the bond between a mother and her daughter.

'It is incumbent upon me to protect ... the people who can't protect themselves.

'I’ll tell you, unequivocally, that yours is the worst case I’ve ever seen.



Time line of abuse

Unknown: Carr and Wilde meet on internet dating site

June 9 to June 11, 2009: Wilde 'directs' Carr into making live recordings with daughter

June 11, 2009: Wilde arrested in England after sending images to 16-year-old girl he met on-line

June 13, 2009: Carr arrested after international hunt

February 2010: Carr pleads guilty

February 8, 2010: Wilde sentenced to four years in jail

March 14, 2011: Carr sentenced to 20 years in jail



'I have always thought possession was bad enough, but production is another level of evil,' the judge added.

'It never crossed my mind that [pornography] would be the child’s
mother. The most natural response, after revulsion, is protecting the
child.'

Carr’s three daughters were all under the age of 4 when she met Wilde on an internet dating site.

She made the sexually abusive live-chat videos of her youngest daughter, who was 34 months old at the time and still in nappies.

Sickeningly, assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Lowell said Wilde had picked the girl out as 'she was the cutest'.

Mr Lowell told Judge Woodcock, 'She was a mouse click away from distributing those images all around the world.'

According to the paper, Mr Lowell also thanked local and English law
enforcement for their quick action to stop the international Internet
crime.

Carr’s four children, her three daughters and a son, were removed from her custody after her arrest.

Mr Lowell said: 'The children are doing well.

'In a real way, her children have been rescued and saved.'


Sick:
Wilde and Carr met on an Internet-based dating site and he chose the
youngest daughter because she was the cutest, prosecutors said.[/right]




Police in the West Midlands region of England discovered the
videos, which were recorded by Nicholas Wilde, in June 2009 while
investigating another child pornography case.

Wilde was arrested after sending child sex abuse images to a 16-year-old girl he met in an internet chat room.

The girl and her mother contacted the police and Wilde was traced and
subsequently arrested by officers from the child exploitation unit at
West Midlands Police.


The clips were made between June 9 and June 11, before being saved onto a memory stick by Wilde.

Shockingly, the films showed Wilde directing Carr in the abuse, according to prosecutors.

After an international hunt the recordings were traced to Maine, and Carr was arrested two days later.

During the trial Carr said Wilde 'conned' her into doing it.

The teenager from Sheffield admitted 10 charges of making, possessing
or distributing indecent images of children and also possessing extreme
pornography.

Wilde also admitted two charges of incitement to commit sexual assault
of a child under 13 – offences that led to the arrest of Carr.

At his sentencing, the court heard that detectives seized a computer
and a memory stick from his bedroom, uncovering a collection of
photographs at the most serious end of the child pornography scale
involving children as young as 18-months-old.

The memory stick also contained footage of a woman in Maine, who later turned out to be Carr, abusing a young child.

Jailing Wilde for four years and eight months, Judge Hilary Watson said
of the exchange with Carr: 'It was entirely for your benefit, at your
direction, for the sexual gratification of Nicholas Wilde.'

The judge added his youth was 'very worrying', saying: 'You have your
whole life ahead of you and the potential to re-offend is very great.'

Source

There are no words.

Sick, that's about all that you CAN say, that, and I hope one of the other women, or all of them, in whatever prison that mother's going to, make her life a living hell because child abusers are generally the very bottom of the prison foodchain and this is a MOTHER, like the judge said, the woman who was supposed to be protecting her daughter.

Nobody should refer to her as a mother for here on out.

It's things like this that make me wish you had to have a permit to have kids.

Impact wrote:It's things like this that make me wish you had to have a permit to have kids.

And that you could sterilize people like this to make sure they can't do it again.

Beyond saying that I think she should get more than twenty years, I'm pretty much speechless.

It is impossible to understand this woman. I, too, don't understand why she got only 20 years.

I am speechless! How could a mother betray that trust. That child was a baby and the only protection that child knows is to come from her mother and she does this. Unbelievable! I've heard horrible things but this tops them all. Plus only 20 years. R U fucking kidding me?? That is a spit in the bucket and she'll be out in 10 and reaffending. For something that unmentionable, the court should leave the sencenting up to the discretion of the judge. I'm sure he would of done at least life or IMO death. That woman has changed that child's life forever, she should have to pay the same penalty. The child is not only going to be affected 20 years! This is just outrageous.