Man receives oral sex and is ordered to pay child support.

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital sex would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral sex: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

“She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,” the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

AtownPeep wrote:

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital sex would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral sex: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

http://jonathanturley.org/2011/02/01/illinois-court-rules-man-can-sue-over-deceptive-use-of-sperm-by-girlfriend-to-impregnate-herself/

What type of hoe logic is this below?

“She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,” the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

thepossiblepolice wrote:


I'm thinking that is gold digger logic myself.

Nystyle709 wrote:This chick does not need to get one red cent of child support from this guy.

femme fatale wrote:A big part of me would want to waive this guy from the responsibility of having to pay child support, because he didn't act irresponsibly.............but the more important bottom line is that a child exists and needs to be taken care of, despite his manipulative witch of a mother.

Nhaiyel wrote:What she did was very deceitful, nefarious, and basically wicked; it sounds like a stunt the seediest of hip hop/sports groupies would pull, as opposed to a woman who is a physician…but let this be a lesson to him about who he allows to perform fellatio on him. Not to sound like Forgiveness Man, but this wouldn't have happened if he had waited until they got married before being intimate with her. The reality now is that a child was conceived from this trifliness, and it has to be taken care of.

2xy wrote:

Nhaiyel wrote:What she did was very deceitful, nefarious, and basically wicked; it sounds like a stunt the seediest of hip hop/sports groupies would pull, as opposed to a woman who is a physician…but let this be a lesson to him about who he allows to perform fellatio on him. Not to sound like Forgiveness Man, but this wouldn't have happened if he had waited until they got married before being intimate with her. The reality now is that a child was conceived from this trifliness, and it has to be taken care of.

I understand where you're coming from, but THANK GOODNESS he didn't marry her! This stunt shows that she is conniving and horrible. If he had "waited," they probably would have ended up divorced, anyway, unless he is as crazy as she is.

Rockbird wrote:It also wouldn't have happened if she had been hit by a bus.

... I think it's a safe assumption that your partner isn't going to impregnate herself with the cum she caught in her mouth.