Quote :

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital sex would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral sex: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

http://jonathanturley.org/2011/02/01/illinois-court-rules-man-can-sue-over-deceptive-use-of-sperm-by-girlfriend-to-impregnate-herself/

What type of hoe logic is this below?

Quote :

“She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,” the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

AtownPeep wrote:

Quote :

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital sex would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral sex: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

http://jonathanturley.org/2011/02/01/illinois-court-rules-man-can-sue-over-deceptive-use-of-sperm-by-girlfriend-to-impregnate-herself/

What type of hoe logic is this below?

Quote :

“She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift — an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,” the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

I'm thinking that is gold digger logic myself.

This chick does not need to get one red cent of child support from this guy.

thepossiblepolice wrote:

I'm thinking that is gold digger logic myself.

Interesting because she's a doc herself. Maybe she wanted to find a way to keep him in her life.

Or maybe she had early retirement in mind. Whatever it was, that's some devious stuff.

Nystyle709 wrote:

This chick does not need to get one red cent of child support from this guy.

She should be shot in the twat.

Women like her just contribute to the stereotype that baby mama take the child support payments to get their nails done. A big part of me would want to waive this guy from the responsibility of having to pay child support, because he didn't act irresponsibly.............but the more important bottom line is that a child exists and needs to be taken care of, despite his manipulative witch of a mother.

femme fatale wrote:

A big part of me would want to waive this guy from the responsibility of having to pay child support, because he didn't act irresponsibly.............but the more important bottom line is that a child exists and needs to be taken care of, despite his manipulative witch of a mother.

The bitch is a doctor. She can take care of her child by herself. Plenty of people do so on far less money. He doesn't owe a dime, IMO.

I won't be part of the popular opinion, but I think he owes. He was out-smarted, and a child was created. A case like this is one in a million, which are most likely ironically, the chances of him ever asking another chick to go down on him!

The next chick just has to swallow, I guess.

This is one of the most irresponsible things I've heard in a long time.

She did all this for $800/month?

Anyway…

What she did was very deceitful, nefarious, and basically wicked; it sounds like a stunt the seediest of hip hop/sports groupies would pull, as opposed to a woman who is a physician…but let this be a lesson to him about who he allows to perform fellatio on him. Not to sound like Forgiveness Man, but this wouldn't have happened if he had waited until they got married before being intimate with her. The reality now is that a child was conceived from this trifliness, and it has to be taken care of.

Nhaiyel wrote:

What she did was very deceitful, nefarious, and basically wicked; it sounds like a stunt the seediest of hip hop/sports groupies would pull, as opposed to a woman who is a physician…but let this be a lesson to him about who he allows to perform fellatio on him. Not to sound like Forgiveness Man, but this wouldn't have happened if he had waited until they got married before being intimate with her. The reality now is that a child was conceived from this trifliness, and it has to be taken care of.

I understand where you're coming from, but THANK GOODNESS he didn't marry her! This stunt shows that she is conniving and horrible. If he had "waited," they probably would have ended up divorced, anyway, unless he is as crazy as she is.

2xy wrote:

Nhaiyel wrote:

What she did was very deceitful, nefarious, and basically wicked; it sounds like a stunt the seediest of hip hop/sports groupies would pull, as opposed to a woman who is a physician…but let this be a lesson to him about who he allows to perform fellatio on him. Not to sound like Forgiveness Man, but this wouldn't have happened if he had waited until they got married before being intimate with her. The reality now is that a child was conceived from this trifliness, and it has to be taken care of.

I understand where you're coming from, but THANK GOODNESS he didn't marry her! This stunt shows that she is conniving and horrible. If he had "waited," they probably would have ended up divorced, anyway, unless he is as crazy as she is.

True. But perhaps if he had waited, he would have sooner or later saw that she was nuts and opted to not continue the relationship.

It also wouldn't have happened if she had been hit by a bus.

... I think it's a safe assumption that your partner isn't going to impregnate herself with the cum she caught in her mouth.

It's asinine what she did and for that he shouldn't have to pay a dime in child support, but if it's all about the child, then she shouldn't be the one to receive and manage his support payments.

Rockbird wrote:

It also wouldn't have happened if she had been hit by a bus.

... I think it's a safe assumption that your partner isn't going to impregnate herself with the cum she caught in her mouth.

. For the most part. Yeah, a child is here now but, well..........tough. If this man had actual intercourse with her, then most definitely he needs to own up to his responsibility. For a kid to come into this world like that is trifling and sad, but the mother is just going have to deal with this on her own. At least she should. That man should have no obligations to this kid whatsoever. If he wants to, that's nice but if he doesn't.....I don't blame him one bit.

Are donors at a sperm bank responsible for the children their seed creates? No. Same here.