Would you be in favor of the president being able to serve for more than two terms, if the public continued to elect him? Why/why not?
+4
CeCe
Forgiveness Man
Supernova
Chris
8 posters
Presidents being able to serve more than two terms.
Chris- Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
Supernova- The Book Chamber
Join date : 2010-06-22
Posts : 11954
Rep : 182
On one hand, a lot of people would not have been happy if George Bush had won a third term, a lot of people can't even figure out why he got a second term, and I can understand that because on the off chance that Obama would ever get elected again, I sure as hell would not be comforted by the fact that after the second batch of 4 years is up he could still be in the White House screwing everything up.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
^^^^^ Nice one Supernova. lol
My answer: HELL NO! We need fresh leadership on a regular basis. If we allowed unlimited terms, a total idiot could maintain power simply because he's a popular person and not because he's a good leader. Also, even if I like a president, I don't want them to "hang onto the job like a pope," to to quote Archie Bunker. The White House has grayed every president for decades; it's a tough job. After 8 years of service, I am sure they are eager to get back to their lives and I don't wanna selfishly hang onto them. (I am sure nobody was happier to see Bush leave the White House than W. himself.)
So no, 2 terms is a good limit. After that, it's time for a fresh face.
My answer: HELL NO! We need fresh leadership on a regular basis. If we allowed unlimited terms, a total idiot could maintain power simply because he's a popular person and not because he's a good leader. Also, even if I like a president, I don't want them to "hang onto the job like a pope," to to quote Archie Bunker. The White House has grayed every president for decades; it's a tough job. After 8 years of service, I am sure they are eager to get back to their lives and I don't wanna selfishly hang onto them. (I am sure nobody was happier to see Bush leave the White House than W. himself.)
So no, 2 terms is a good limit. After that, it's time for a fresh face.
Supernova- The Book Chamber
Join date : 2010-06-22
Posts : 11954
Rep : 182
Yeah, I remember the morning after Bush and his wife left Washington and went back home to Texas, and he told everybody 'tomorrow, I'm going to get up and cook Laura breakfast, walk the dog, get the newspaper, mow the lawn, read a book, and that's just before breakfast'.
CeCe- …is a Chamber DEITY.
- Join date : 2010-06-30
Posts : 11962
Rep : 326
I like the 2 term limit. A refresh every 4-8 years is a good thing.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
Supernova wrote:Yeah, I remember the morning after Bush and his wife left Washington and went back home to Texas, and he told everybody 'tomorrow, I'm going to get up and cook Laura breakfast, walk the dog, get the newspaper, mow the lawn, read a book, and that's just before breakfast'.
Yup. IDK who would even WANT to run for a third term, and if they do, we probably don't want them as president in the first place.
Alan Smithee- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-09-03
Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
Posts : 25792
Rep : 381
Chris wrote:Would you be in favor of the president being able to serve for more than two terms, if the public continued to elect him? Why/why not?
Chris, do you mean a repel of the 22nd Amendment that was ratified in 1951? Until FDR was elected to a 3rd & 4th term, no other U.S. president had ever been elected to more than two terms anyway. Certain factions have been trying to repeal it ever since.
TSJFan4Ever- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-03-28
Posts : 5362
Rep : 78
In Canada, our prime minsters can serve more than two terms but we also don't have a set election every 4 years. There are pros and cons. One of our most famous PMs served from 1969-1980 and 1980-1984. He was controversial but he really lead Canada through some rough times and he gave us our current Constitution. My parents remember him very fondly. With other PMs, though, it would be nice to see change. Our whole system is different though. We don't' elect our PM directly. We elect party members and the one with the most party members is the party whose leader becomes out prime minister. Than can allow for things to change, if they feel a leader really isn't doing a good job, such as when Chretien stepped down and Martin took over.
Kral- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Posts : 1973
Rep : 30
Not consecutively, they shouldn't. No matter how popular they are, after nearly a decade the country's leadership needs fresh blood and a new perspective. However I would be ok with former presidents being able to run again after someone else has been in office. I would vote for Clinton (Bill) he were able to run again.
Nhaiyel- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Location : Jersey (West Orange)
Posts : 3137
Rep : 123
No. Term limits provide a means of ensuring that the people are properly represented. Term limits also help to ensure that democracy is ensured in that no one is allowed to gain too much power in government. By ensuring that no President can serve more than two terms, democracy ensures that competing voices continue to emerge in politics.
|
|
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:17 am by Chris
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:16 am by Chris
» New project
Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:17 am by wants2laugh
» st pattys day
Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:21 am by Bluesmama
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:11 pm by wants2laugh
» Red?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:05 pm by Alan Smithee
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:57 pm by wants2laugh
» Canned Foods
Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:57 pm by CeCe
» English Muffins or Toast?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:45 pm by Nystyle709