by captainbryce Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:09 pm
wants2laugh wrote:Do you think that the death penalty should be utilized in all murders? murders which include other felonies such as rape... or others situations.
I don't think it should be utilized at all. I see it as a hypocrisy more than anything else. And admittedly, I have flip-flopped over this position MANY times and I might be more accepting of it IF our system of justice was....."better" than it is now. But the fact that capital punishment has not been proven to be a deterrent to crimes, that it ultimately costs more money to have someone put on death row in the long run than it does to imprison them for life, and the fact that people have been put to death before, only to be later found innocent after the fact kind of makes me lean in the direction against it. The death penalty is not "justice". It is a public display of a mass emotional reaction to vengence by our primitive society. MOST people who are for the death penalty want to HURT and KILL people who wronged someone else in such a way. From a moral point of view, that makes them just as EVIL as the criminal they are seeking to destroy. I believe that a truly enlightened person would adopt a philosophy of forgiveness and mercy even for someone who hasn't shown them any. Kind of like that guy who most death penalty supporters claim to follow. I think his name was JESUS or something like that.
Then there is the element of personal guilt and reflection. To me, the death penalty doesn't teach anything to the criminal. Forcing them to live for the rest of their life in prison, knowing that they will never live a normal life because of what they did seems a harsher punishment to me than just giving them a needle to put them to sleep forever. Life without parole gives the criminal time to relive in their memories the suffering which they've cause to others for the rest of their life! In that circumstance, one can either live a miserable life or turn to "God" and find redemption of some sort. Either way, as long as they are not a threat to the public, I see that as a more poetic justice.
I believe that we as human beings are uniquely unqualified to judge others in public law when it comes to deciding life or death. Our system of justice is too flawed to make the institution of capital punishment ethical. If I was on the jury for Steven Hayes or Joshua Komisarjevsky (the men who murdered the Petit family during a home invasion), I would probably vote FOR the death penalty along with everyone else in the room. Because if anyone "deserves" to die, it's those two scumbags. They raped, tortured and murdered a wife and two girls and destroyed William Petit's life forever. I hate them, and I want them to die. Like I said, it's more about the emotional need for revenge than a sense of public service. And that's exactly why there should be no death penalty! Because wishing harm on bad people is not "justice", it's hypocrisy.
Last edited by captainbryce on Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:17 am by Chris
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:16 am by Chris
» New project
Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:17 am by wants2laugh
» st pattys day
Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:21 am by Bluesmama
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:11 pm by wants2laugh
» Red?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:05 pm by Alan Smithee
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:57 pm by wants2laugh
» Canned Foods
Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:57 pm by CeCe
» English Muffins or Toast?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:45 pm by Nystyle709