Jason B.
…is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-11
Posts : 2967
Rep : 70
 | | Subject: Was Natalie a bad idea? Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:52 am | |
| I always said Clint and Viki didn't need that extra daughter and that everything was better when it was just Kevin, Joey and Jessica (plus Cord and Megan on the side). You think it benefited them in any way to bring on Nat? | |
|
Tony Marino
…is a Global Moderator.
Join date : 2010-01-31
Location : New York
Posts : 26786
Rep : 607
| | Subject: Re: Was Natalie a bad idea? Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:55 am | |
| Yes she was. I always felt Natalie was a waste and she never really fit in with the Buchanan's over the years. | |
|
Chris
Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
| | Subject: Re: Was Natalie a bad idea? Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:00 pm | |
| Yes. Natalie, IMO, was very awkwardly placed and threw off the entire dynamic. She is also one of the reasons Kevin and Joey ceased to being as important to the show as they had been. | |
|
Tony Marino
…is a Global Moderator.
Join date : 2010-01-31
Location : New York
Posts : 26786
Rep : 607
| | Subject: Re: Was Natalie a bad idea? Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:06 pm | |
| - Chris wrote:
- Yes. Natalie, IMO, was very awkwardly placed and threw off the entire dynamic. She is also one of the reasons Kevin and Joey ceased to being as important to the show as they had been.
Yeah it would have been a whole lot better if they would have had Kevin and Joey on the show rather then make up viki being raped by Mitch and being Jessica's father. | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Was Natalie a bad idea? | |
| |
|
Hitskin.com
Calendar
