CC33

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CC33


5 posters

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Adrian LePere
    Adrian LePere
    …is a Newbie.
    …is a Newbie.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-06-16
    Posts : 116
    Rep : 2

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by Adrian LePere Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:37 pm

    Even if she killed Bull in defense of James (who she wounded), she still should have been charged with something. She must've changed her name to Starr Lord or Starr Cramer to avoid the DA/LPD Manning witch hunt.
    TSJFan4Ever
    TSJFan4Ever
    …is a Chamber Royal.
    …is a Chamber Royal.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-03-28
    Posts : 5362
    Rep : 78

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Re: Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by TSJFan4Ever Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:27 pm

    LOL! Actually, I think it was Todd who shot Bull but yeah - realistically, she should be facing charges. Maybe John and Nora have forgotten she's a Manning and are going to let her get away with her crimes the way they do whenever it's someone other than Todd or Lindsay committing the crime?

    Technically, Todd's the one who should be charged with murdering Bull in self defence and Starr should be charged with shooting James. I think it'll just be all swept under the rug, the way Cole's vicious murder attempt will be.
    Forgiveness Man
    Forgiveness Man
    …is a Chamber Royal.
    …is a Chamber Royal.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-06-25
    Location : Chilling on your sofa
    Posts : 6657
    Rep : 153

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Re: Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by Forgiveness Man Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:20 pm

    She didn't shoot Bull, Todd did. You don't get charged for self-defense kills. And James' shooting was an accident. If Jared doesn't get charged for actually tossing a man through a skylight, why would Starr get charged for this? Besides, Nora only likes charging Todd and Lindsey.
    gmruss4
    gmruss4
    …is Authorized.
    …is Authorized.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-06-27
    Posts : 926
    Rep : 8

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Re: Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by gmruss4 Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:38 pm

    She didn't kill Bull, Todd did and it was self defense and James said it was an accident and he is not pressing any charges.
    aublack40
    aublack40
    …is Significant.
    …is Significant.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-07-03
    Posts : 301
    Rep : 7

    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Re: Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by aublack40 Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:14 am

    as long as she is with cole,she will never be charged with a crime. however if she leaves cole, she'll be treated like ant other manning.

    Sponsored content


    Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting? Empty Re: Shouldn't Starr haven gotten charged with Bull's murder and James shooting?

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:19 am