So, I got into an argument on another forum about this very subject and someone suggested that having nude pictures of children represents "child pornography" even if they're completely innocent and they happen to be your own child. I of course found this to be completely nonsensical, but I'm wondering just how many other people out there feel the same way. Is is "wrong" to take nude pics of children if there are not sexual in nature. And if so, WHY? I just don't get it.

I don't think it is wrong, but I do think it is wrong to post them on a public forum. Not of yourself, but of your kids.

These days, most families have the ability to print at home or just save that type of pic on digital media. So, for people to balk about it being pornographic is silly.

captainbryce wrote:

So, I got into an argument on another forum about this very subject and someone suggested that having nude pictures of children represents "child pornography" even if they're completely innocent and they happen to be your own child. I of course found this to be completely nonsensical, but I'm wondering just how many other people out there feel the same way. Is is "wrong" to take nude pics of children if there are not sexual in nature. And if so, WHY? I just don't get it.

If people think any and ALL naked pictures of babies are pornography, THEY are the ones with the dirty minds.

Our parents have pics of all of us naked when we were babies. Its the perverts that think the pics are porn.