CC33

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CC33


3 posters

    The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA

    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-03
    Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
    Posts : 25792
    Rep : 381
    • Post n°1

    The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA Empty The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA

    Post by Alan Smithee Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:11 pm

    Early next year, the court is supposed to hear a case on the constitutionality of letting police departments collect DNA samples from people they arrest although I don't know if that's for all crimes. For example, presently NJ allows DNA collection for people convicted of all crimes that carry a prison sentence of six months or more and people arrested for serious crimes like murder and sexual offenses.

    On a gut level, my libertarian sensibilities says this seems like something they would do in a totalitarian state but taking fingerprints has long been an accepted tool of law enforcement and the simple swabbing of the inside of your cheek is a lot less intrusive than a full body cavity search. Keeping in mind that DNA evidence has successfully gotten innocent people out of prison and off of death row, is this a necessary tool to keep the law abiding safe form criminals or another erosion of our right to privacy? Thoughts?
    • Back to top
    Supernova
    Supernova
    Supernova
    The Book Chamber
    The Book Chamber


    Female
    Join date : 2010-06-22
    Posts : 11954
    Rep : 182
    • Post n°2

    The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA Empty Re: The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA

    Post by Supernova Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:20 pm

    Alan Smithee wrote:Early next year, the court is supposed to hear a case on the constitutionality of letting police departments collect DNA samples from people they arrest although I don't know if that's for all crimes. For example, presently NJ allows DNA collection for people convicted of all crimes that carry a prison sentence of six months or more and people arrested for serious crimes like murder and sexual offenses.

    On a gut level, my libertarian sensibilities says this seems like something they would do in a totalitarian state but taking fingerprints has long been an accepted tool of law enforcement and the simple swabbing of the inside of your cheek is a lot less intrusive than a full body cavity search. Keeping in mind that DNA evidence has successfully gotten innocent people out of prison and off of death row, is this a necessary tool to keep the law abiding safe form criminals or another erosion of our right to privacy? Thoughts?

    I think only if they're involved in violent crimes should it be taken, since after all DNA is usually only used to clear people OF violent crimes like rape and murder.
    • Back to top
    Shale
    Shale
    Shale
    ...is a Chamber Royal.
    ...is a Chamber Royal.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-27
    Location : Miami Beach
    Posts : 9699
    Rep : 219
    • Post n°3

    The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA Empty Re: The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA

    Post by Shale Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:48 pm

    Supernova wrote:I think only if they're involved in violent crimes should it be taken, since after all DNA is usually only used to clear people OF violent crimes like rape and murder.
    co-signs
    • Back to top
    Sponsored content

    Sponsored content


    • Post n°4

    The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA Empty Re: The U.S. Supreme Court and DNA

    Post by Sponsored content

    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:56 pm