Molested or seduced?

Shale wrote:

Nystyle709 wrote:
That's besides the point. Blowing off the fact that something perverted has been done to them isn't something to aim for or hope for. That's essentially what you're saying.

No, I did not say that.


If you say so.

Nystyle709 wrote:"I used to play with my cousin's pussy and she really liked it". "My cousin had coarse hairs around her pussy". "When I wanted to stop, she didn't". "We were only 9 and 11 'playing doctor". .

You put things into quotation marks as if you are quoting me. In journalism that is a no-no. You are taking things out of context and presenting them to make it look different that the nuance of my presentation.

What I actually said was:

1. "I used to play with my 11-year-old cousin's pussy and she really liked it.

2. "(I was 9 at the time, playing doctor. And I would tire of my probing and want to quit and she would insist that I examine her further.)

3. "Kids can be sexually curious before puberty (Actually, I remember little short coarse hairs around cuz' pussy - just starting puberty)."


LOL, it's that serious? I paraphrased it. So what.

1. My initial shocking statement was the lead.

2. My initial shcoking statement becomes less shocking when I reveal that we were kids playing. The fact that my cousin initiated the play may sound lurid the way you presented it, but fact is I got tired of this new thing and was going to move on to something else but my older cousin apparently enjoyed the feel of my fingers in her privates.

3. And, since I was way pre-pubescent, I did take note of the strange hairs growing in my cousin's crotch. Also her budding pubescence may have made her more sexually inquisitive than my younger curiosity.

When quoting someone you ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CHANGE THEIR WORDS. Otherwise it is not a quote, it is your paraphrase, which will be from your slant.


It would be a from my slant if it didn't mean the same damn thing. Sorry, but I don't have to quote you verbatim to generalize or dispute what you said. Who the hell said this was college? I'm not writing a term paper. We have to be grammatically correct now? Tell me that what I paraphrased and what you actually said verbatim are two completely different things with two completely different meanings. Then you can talk and dwell on this pettiness about me not quoting you properly. Get to the gist of what I had a problem with in regards to your statement.

Nystyle709 wrote:Then in the next breath, you're going to state that adults if wouldn't react to children doing this type of behavior, they would blow off perverted things being done them as if it should be a normal part of growing up. Try to read your statement from the outside looking in and tell me if that shit doesn't come off as being ridiculous. If that's not what you meant, then my bad....but I'm only going by what I read. That's what I called you out on.

Well, I haven't heard anyone else who read that from the outside take me to task for what they thot I wrote.


Who cares? Who said someone else had to speak on it? I read something I didn't agree with and I spoke on it.

Nystyle709 wrote:I said OR. Kids fucking OR playing with each other's genitals. And/oractually. ... Your statement just didn't come off right to me......I'll accept the fact that I misunderstood, but you also didn't word it properly either.

I tell it like it is.


IYSS. Perhaps it's my fault for giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you know what "and/or" means. I suggest you not take someone's else's quote 'out of context' either.

Nystyle709 wrote:[color=black]But that is the persona that you put forth on here. If I offended you, then I'm sorry.[/size]

I don't know what persona has prejudiced you so against me.

Me prejudiced against you? LOL.

Granted, by my experience I am an iconoclast against the contrived propriety that so many in the mainstream culture profess, but I am not completely given to hedonism, nor do I exploit others sexually or otherwise. I have some decent core values - just don't subscribe to the sex negativity that so many traditionalist do.

Nystyle709 wrote: LOL, it's that serious? I paraphrased it. So what.

Shale wrote:

Nystyle709 wrote: LOL, it's that serious? I paraphrased it. So what.

I guess for those involved in journalism it is that serious. When you paraphrase someone you do not put it into quotes.

It is just one of the rules; like proper attribution and separating fact from conjecture. And it has nothing to do with being in school. But if you learned anything in school that could be applied to the real world it might not be a bad idea to use the discipline.