I think I've already made my stand on it clear, it was terrible, the Black Eye Peas' performance sucked and they needed 50 thousand light up freaks dancing in arrows around them to be interesting, you can note the cameras didn't focus on them too much, they kept cutting back to all the dancers instead, and if you're a big name group and world famous, I wouldn't think they'd need to draw the attention AWAY from you. People left and right have been calling this the WORST halftime show ever and I will believe it. Next time they need to get in somebody whose big idea for the show isn't to just be a walking Christmas tree.

It could have been better but it was okay. The biggest thing that bothered me about it is how BEP did a melody of their greatest hits. Old songs that I couldn't care less about anymore. I think Usher sucked though and was useless on stage.

It was alright. Typical halftime show. I don't know what people were expecting.

I still say the Stones gave the best halftime show in '06. Followed by U2. BEP made me yawn.

not a fan of black eyed peas, so didnt matter how good/bad they did to me.

Impact wrote:

I still say the Stones gave the best halftime show in '06. Followed by U2. BEP made me yawn.

Agreed about the Rolling Stones, they were the best I've seen in all the years I've been watching.

I like the Black eyed peas but they sucked at half time. I looked forward to watching Glee afterwards.

I'd like to see a good stand up comic do a 20 minute set for a change.

The halftime show was hideous as it usually is. The only two that stand out for me is The Stones & Springsteen. Most of the time I'd rather see a blank screen.

I didn't think it was that bad.