Shale wrote:Slut Bag? Whoring yourself out? You're being pretty nasty with the name calling. (might even be against forum board rules)
Name calling? I didn't call YOU a slut bag, I didn't say YOU were whoring yourself out. Learn to interpret....since you're supposed to be a writer and all. I was speaking in general. LOL, you should familarize yourself with Nystyle's style of brashness.
But it is colorful I suppose. And it shows your parochial, sex-negative attitude as well as your ignorance of what was happening in America and Europe 40 years ago.
LMAO. And just where did you ascertain that I have a sex negative attitude? Because I don't feel right in sleeping with half of NYC's male population? First of all, I'm not 'ignorant' of any of the things you claim I am. Funny how you come to that conclusion because I don't agree. The question that was asked was do you think promiscuity is wrong. I stated what I feel it is. I don't see the excitement in sleeping with any and everybody and here you come with some bullshit about it feels good and that's why people do it. That's totally and completely stupid. You don't have to open your legs to every Tom, Dick and Harry for sex to feel good. 'Sexual Revolution' of the 60's, 80's or whatever else you want to come up with is no excuse.
I did not invent the Sexual Revolution or Free Luv, but I was an active participant with millions of other young ppl of the day. It came about in large part because of the dishonest, prudery of the 1950s in which we all grew up.
Maaaan, I don't give a damn about any of that. WHO asked you that?
You would've liked that Ozzie & Hariet/Leave it to Beaver time of sexual repression, except maybe for the blatant racial discrimination that also was the norm. We young slut bags, also rebelled against that and lived with and even made love to ppl of different races.
How nice. You're crazy. I find it hilarious that you're assuming I'm sexually repressed or that I don't know any of this simply because I'm not a fan of being a slut. And quite frankly, the 'sexual revolution of the 60's and 70's' wasn't about that any damn way. It was about people who were being a lot more open about their sexuality and were more willing to talk about sex and not stifle their desires, which I will agree is a good thing, but that doesn't mean it was an excuse or should've been an excuse to jump in the sack with every person they see. Because quite frankly, it's been going on before the 60's.
Like I say, you had to have been there.
No I didn't.
Zeitgeist
Here is one of my favorite foto series from Eros in 1962
It celebrates the new sexual freedom of the day as well as interracial lovers.
BTW, This was a controversial publication and Ralph Ginsberg got arrested for pornography with what is clearly not considered porn these days. What this picture series suggests was not only promiscuity but was against the law in over 15 states. The propriety or the racial segregation did not make sense to many young ppl of the '60s.
. Oh dear God..........
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:17 am by Chris
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:16 am by Chris
» New project
Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:17 am by wants2laugh
» st pattys day
Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:21 am by Bluesmama
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:11 pm by wants2laugh
» Red?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:05 pm by Alan Smithee
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:57 pm by wants2laugh
» Canned Foods
Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:57 pm by CeCe
» English Muffins or Toast?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:45 pm by Nystyle709