CC33

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CC33


5 posters

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Chris
    Chris
    Chris
    Chamber Admin.
    Chamber Admin.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-01-30
    Location : Oak Park, Michigan
    Posts : 23201
    Rep : 330
    • Post n°1

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Chris Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:20 pm

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/41649016/ns/today-entertainment/


    SJP wants a Sex In the City 3. I say let it go. They shouldn't have pushed after the first film became a hit. It's not often that a television show (if it isn't a theatrical reboot of a vintage series) hits the big screen. I think with the second people remembered that SITC was a television show.
    • Back to top
    RedBedroom
    RedBedroom
    RedBedroom
    …is a Chamber DEITY.
    …is a Chamber DEITY.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-02-18
    Posts : 10696
    Rep : 312
    • Post n°2

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by RedBedroom Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:44 pm

    I am very surprised that she would be up for that. The first movie was so much better than the second.
    • Back to top
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-03
    Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
    Posts : 25792
    Rep : 381
    • Post n°3

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Alan Smithee Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:11 am

    The bottom line is…well literally the bottom line. If someone thinks another one will make any money, it could happen. I don’t know that her three co-stars would turn down the paycheck.
    • Back to top
    Chris
    Chris
    Chris
    Chamber Admin.
    Chamber Admin.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-01-30
    Location : Oak Park, Michigan
    Posts : 23201
    Rep : 330
    • Post n°4

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Chris Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:41 am

    alan smithee wrote:The bottom line is…well literally the bottom line. If someone thinks another one will make any money, it could happen. I don’t know that her three co-stars would turn down the paycheck.

    I think that's SJP's bottom line. As executive producer, she gets a hefty advance and continuous revenue, even if the movie tanks. The other actors would have more to lose if they signed on to do a movie that's projected to bomb.
    • Back to top
    Nystyle709
    Nystyle709
    Nystyle709
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-03-16
    Location : New York
    Posts : 27030
    Rep : 339
    • Post n°5

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Nystyle709 Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:01 am

    I never even saw the first two.
    • Back to top
    Cheaps
    Cheaps
    Cheaps
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-11-17
    Posts : 25876
    Rep : 252
    • Post n°6

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Cheaps Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:19 am

    ok, i LOVED the series, first movie i loved also, i was so disappointed wit second movie, they shouldnt make 3rd.
    • Back to top
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-03
    Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
    Posts : 25792
    Rep : 381
    • Post n°7

    Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3' Empty Re: Sarah Jessica Parker: Let's make 'Sex 3'

    Post by Alan Smithee Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:56 am

    Chris wrote:I think that's SJP's bottom line. As executive producer, she gets a hefty advance and continuous revenue, even if the movie tanks. The other actors would have more to lose if they signed on to do a movie that's projected to bomb.

    I'm not saying the other three ladies have been out of work since SITC wrapped but SJP has still been the most active, in films anyway. Maybe they all got sweet residual deals so her co-stars can be pickier about what work roles they’ll take. If so, Kristin Davis should have been a little more discerning about Couples Retreat.
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:36 am