CC33

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CC33


5 posters

    'Separate but Equal'

    Chris
    Chris
    Chamber Admin.
    Chamber Admin.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-01-30
    Location : Oak Park, Michigan
    Posts : 23201
    Rep : 330

    'Separate but Equal' Empty 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by Chris Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:13 am

    The general consensus is that 'Separate but Equal,' as far as the law goes, is never actually equal. Do you agree? Is it possible that people can be legally divided into categories (with slightly adjusted privileges), and still treated with the equal respect - despite the separation?
    CeCe
    CeCe
    …is a Chamber DEITY.
    …is a Chamber DEITY.


    Join date : 2010-06-30
    Posts : 11962
    Rep : 326

    'Separate but Equal' Empty Re: 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by CeCe Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:24 am

    "Adjusted" privileges doesn't qualify as equal for me. We're either equal or we're not.
    Forgiveness Man
    Forgiveness Man
    …is a Chamber Royal.
    …is a Chamber Royal.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-06-25
    Location : Chilling on your sofa
    Posts : 6657
    Rep : 153

    'Separate but Equal' Empty Re: 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by Forgiveness Man Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:45 am

    Nature divides us. Clearly nature does buy into the separate, but equal notion. IMO, people aren't after equality. They are after being given something somebody else has that they want, under the guise of "equality." The modern view of "equality" has really just turned the word into another meaningless word. We got plenty of "adjusted" privileges in all walks of life that we overlook, anyway.


    Last edited by Forgiveness Man on Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:37 am; edited 1 time in total
    Nystyle709
    Nystyle709
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-03-16
    Location : New York
    Posts : 27030
    Rep : 339

    'Separate but Equal' Empty Re: 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by Nystyle709 Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:34 am

    No. Because then it comes into question on WHO determines who gets who adjusted privilege or who determines what's equal. Everyone has to fit in some category.
    Shale
    Shale
    ...is a Chamber Royal.
    ...is a Chamber Royal.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-27
    Location : Miami Beach
    Posts : 9699
    Rep : 219

    'Separate but Equal' Empty Re: 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by Shale Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:46 am

    CeCe wrote:"Adjusted" privileges doesn't qualify as equal for me. We're either equal or we're not.
    co-signs

    If equal then why the need for separate?

    Sponsored content


    'Separate but Equal' Empty Re: 'Separate but Equal'

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:21 pm