Home
Are you for or against the DNA testing of fetuses, for any given reason: possibly health risks and limitations, paternity tests, etc., etc.?
5 posters
Prenatal DNA testing: for or against?
Chris- Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
Alan Smithee- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-09-03
Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
Posts : 25792
Rep : 381
As long as it's not used for eugenics.
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
Well, they already take a sample of amniotic fluid from the womb to determine what genetic mutations or conditions the baby may have while pregnant. But actually poking the fetus itself? I don't think they should. Wait until the baby is born for all of that. Paternity tests, all you have to do is swab his mouth.
Supernova- The Book Chamber
Join date : 2010-06-22
Posts : 11954
Rep : 182
Nystyle709 wrote:Well, they already take a sample of amniotic fluid from the womb to determine what genetic mutations or conditions the baby may have while pregnant. But actually poking the fetus itself? I don't think they should. Wait until the baby is born for all of that. Paternity tests, all you have to do is swab his mouth.
This.
Nhaiyel- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Location : Jersey (West Orange)
Posts : 3137
Rep : 123
Unless it's something immediately pressing (and can mean the difference between healthy or deficient), I wouldn't be in favor using an unborn fetus as a genuine pig for medical experimentation.
|
|
|
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
» New project
» st pattys day
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
» Red?
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
» Canned Foods
» English Muffins or Toast?