What do you think about religious, or faith-based, schools receiving government funding? Would you be in support of it, or object to it, seeing it as a violation of church/state?
+7
zthatzmanz28
Tony Marino
Shale
Forgiveness Man
Alan Smithee
Nystyle709
Chris
11 posters
Should faith run schools receive government funding?
Chris- Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
It's in violation of separating church and state....so no, I can't co-sign it.
Alan Smithee- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-09-03
Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
Posts : 25792
Rep : 381
No way.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
Chris wrote:What do you think about religious, or faith-based, schools receiving government funding? Would you be in support of it, or object to it, seeing it as a violation of church/state?
But it is NOT a violation of church/state. Just give funds to all of them and no violation! This Church/State thing is so laughable. The government isn't violating it when it tells Catholic Institutions what it has to pay for but it's violating it when it gives schools funds? lol The Church/State separation is just an imaginary thing the left uses to try and keep government from doing things they don't like and they'll regularly violate that same separation themselves when it's convenient. Separation of Church and State is just the left's excuse to practice discrimination.
HOWEVER, I don't think the national government should be giving money to school, period. Throwing more money at our schools isn't working now and hasn't in a long time. Government monies are a curse, if anything. If we got the fed government out of education, that'd probably be the first step in improving education in this country!
Last edited by Forgiveness Man on Tue May 29, 2012 6:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Shale- ...is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-09-27
Location : Miami Beach
Posts : 9699
Rep : 219
Alan Smithee wrote:No way.
Tony Marino- …is a Global Moderator.
Join date : 2010-01-31
Location : New York
Posts : 26786
Rep : 607
Nystyle709 wrote:It's in violation of separating church and state....so no, I can't co-sign it.
zthatzmanz28- …is Significant.
Join date : 2011-12-19
Location : Brighton / DETROIT MI
Posts : 444
Rep : 13
Sure why not. I can be a modern day Joseph Smith or Charles Russell and start my own religion, complete with school. How long before the far-right-nut-jobs, who support vouchers. would begin to whine and look to change the law to exclude the school of The Great Satan Here and Now?
CeCe- …is a Chamber DEITY.
- Join date : 2010-06-30
Posts : 11962
Rep : 326
Not one cent.
captainbryce- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-04-11
Location : California
Posts : 2051
Rep : 127
I thought conservatives wanted to CUT government spending. What is the economic justification for granting government funds to EVERY private school? Would Muslim schools also receive government funding? This notion is so ridiculous that I sure even if YOU think about it a little more you'd see why it doesn't make sense.Forgiveness Man wrote:But it is NOT a violation of church/state. Just give funds to all of them and no violation!
Exactly! And that is textbook.Forgiveness Man wrote:This Church/State thing is so laughable. The government isn't violating it when it tells Catholic Institutions what it has to pay for but it's violating it when it gives schools funds?
Actually, let me stop you right there because it happens to be a very REAL thing that is referenced in the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution and historically reinforced by the US Supreme court under every administration, Republican and Democrat since 1947. So the idea that it is an "imaginary thing" is a false statement according to precedents set for the last 60 odd years. Okay, go on...Forgiveness Man wrote:lol The Church/State separation is just an imaginary thing the left uses...
This is perhaps the single most ridiculous and nonsensical thing I've ever heard anyone say (and are not joking) on this forum....no exaggeration!Forgiveness Man wrote:HOWEVER, I don't think the national government should be giving money to school, period. Throwing more money at our schools isn't working now and hasn't in a long time. Government monies are a curse, if anything. If we got the fed government out of education, that'd probably be the first step in improving education in this country!
1. The public education system cannot function without government funding. In fact, the government MUST provide funding towards public schools because attendance at school is compulsory in the United States. So it's not even optional that the government pay for school, it's actually mandated by law and required by the demands of our society.
2. The government has NOT thrown "more money" at our schools. It's thrown money at the education system (we are exaggerating exactly how big an increase this has been each year) in order to prevent it from collapsing! But the little bit of money that is added to the annual budget for education does NOTHING to actually improve the schools. The money supplements the increasing costs associated with cuts in state funding, increasing labor costs and lower tax revenues. Increased federal funding hasn't been used to "improve" the education system, it's been used to keep it from going under! If we got the Fed OUT of the education system, it would completely collapse nationwide in less than 6 months.
So your suggestion shows a fundamental lack of understanding concerning the US public school system AND the government in general!
It depends! Mostly on WHY the government has chosen to support this particular school. I don't exactly agree with Nystyle709 who suggested that such support is automatically a violation of the constitution. That's not necessarily true. Just to play Devil's advocate for a second (no pun intended), IF for example a Catholic school is receiving government funding because they also provide community services that benefit that surrounding neighborhoods, then they SHOULD qualify for government funding because they are providing a service to the community that is not faith based. The fact that they happen to be a "religious school" would be irrelevant in that case. Now, IF on the other hand the government was just supplying them funds for no reason, then that might become a violation of the constitution because this school is a private institution that is religious based. In order for it to be FAIR, like FM previously said, it would have to provide funding for ALL PRIVATE SCHOOLS, including faith based schools of EVERY religion. And that is NEVER going to happen! Even if the majority of Democrats supported that idea, not a single Republican in congress would vote in favor of it and very few Independents as well. So it's a completely unrealistic suggestion.Chris wrote:What do you think about religious, or faith-based, schools receiving government funding? Would you be in support of it, or object to it, seeing it as a violation of church/state?
Artemis- …is a Newbie.
Join date : 2011-11-18
Posts : 87
Rep : 0
hmm. I'm pretty sure that the govt does give some funding to private, religious schools in Australa. The Idea being that the parents of these kids are still paying taxes, and these children are not in the public system (ie, alleviating the load of public education).
I don't have a problem with it, as long as the public schools get most of the funding
I don't have a problem with it, as long as the public schools get most of the funding
jennab85- …is an Up 'N Comer.
Join date : 2011-03-17
Posts : 261
Rep : 2
No
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
Faith schools shouldn't get money if only to keep them from turning into the trash heaps that every school that gets government money turns into! We all know that schools that get money from the government only do so if they follow the agenda. Why take money from the very thing screwing schools up?
Now of course, I know the left hates the idea of vouchers and would rather pay a heck of a lot more to educate kids in public school than to have them go somewhere that costs a fraction of the price. So yeah, we can't give families with limited finances any options. (They're the ones who really get screwed over by government.) But until the government changes it's ways, I suppose it's how we have to live. Let the government keep pouring our money into education in some futile effort to fix it. We'll keep faith-run schools away from their "help."
Now of course, I know the left hates the idea of vouchers and would rather pay a heck of a lot more to educate kids in public school than to have them go somewhere that costs a fraction of the price. So yeah, we can't give families with limited finances any options. (They're the ones who really get screwed over by government.) But until the government changes it's ways, I suppose it's how we have to live. Let the government keep pouring our money into education in some futile effort to fix it. We'll keep faith-run schools away from their "help."
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:17 am by Chris
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:16 am by Chris
» New project
Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:17 am by wants2laugh
» st pattys day
Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:21 am by Bluesmama
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:11 pm by wants2laugh
» Red?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:05 pm by Alan Smithee
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:57 pm by wants2laugh
» Canned Foods
Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:57 pm by CeCe
» English Muffins or Toast?
Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:45 pm by Nystyle709