LOL. I kind of figured that. Then I would have had to ask him why the post read, "Last edited by Forgiveness Man..." Maybe one day he'll learn that you always need to be sure you have a round in the chamber because if you point an unloaded gun someone's liable to take it away and beat your brains out with it. Also, "The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect."

Excuse me but I edit my posts when I have more to add to it, not cause I am caught. What an arrogant comment. Fine, let me make mine: Truth never makes sense to those not in touch with it, hence why NY thinks my comments don't make sense when they clearly do. See? I can make arrogant statements too! But honestly, I am a writer. Writers edit to say things better. I edit to say things better. If NY can't handle that, well, tough.

But NY is dead wrong on this one. I mentioned the condom under a nickname, the raincoat. I see it clearly visible in the quoted portion of your post alan. I can forgive you for missing it but NY's comment is just dead wrong.My mention of the condom was not something edited in after I made that later post, it is plainly visible in your quote. So if we're going to talk about having a round in the chamber, maybe I am not the one you need to give that lecture to.

Edit: Yes I am editing this in. Deal with it NY! I just checked the post in question. There is no "Last edited by Forgiveness Man" that I can see visible on it. Maybe I need glasses(in which case ya'll are paying for them ), but I just don't see it.

When you're right you're right!

I'm just going to have to accept your previous statements that there's no way anyone can convince you that any form of contraception is OK.

alansmithee wrote:

I'm just going to have to accept your previous statements that there's no way anyone can convince you that any form of contraception is OK.

Artificially, nope! To me, from a natural POV, it's little different than a drug that makes you vomit up dessert so you don't get fat.

I'm going to have to repeat an earlier question. While I made it clear that I respect your opinion (as much as I disagree with it) against "unnatural" contraception you still haven't made it clear why you think "raincoats" are dumb.

I didn't read the whole thread. Just glanced at it. So Forgiveness Man is okay with condoms? Don't they impede the natural process too, especially with thier being coaded with spermacide.

Those innocent swimmers... murdered.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:

Excuse me but I edit my posts when I have more to add to it, not cause I am caught. What an arrogant comment. Fine, let me make mine: Truth never makes sense to those not in touch with it, hence why NY thinks my comments don't make sense when they clearly do. See? I can make arrogant statements too! But honestly, I am a writer. Writers edit to say things better. I edit to say things better. If NY can't handle that, well, tough.

But NY is dead wrong on this one. I mentioned the condom under a nickname, the raincoat. I see it clearly visible in the quoted portion of your post alan. I can forgive you for missing it but NY's comment is just dead wrong.My mention of the condom was not something edited in after I made that later post, it is plainly visible in your quote. So if we're going to talk about having a round in the chamber, maybe I am not the one you need to give that lecture to.

LMAO!!!!!!!! Stoooooop!! Please!! You went back and edited the post AFTER he quoted it. He quote CLEARLY doesn't have the word 'raincoat' in it. I read the entire post before I left for work and you DID NOT mention 'raincoat'. You said that shit after you got called out on it. Where's Chris?! He's the administrator and I know he has the record of it.....Chis, how many times did that fool edit that post yesterday? Post the times. LMAO!!!! You are fucking STUPID. Damn, that really must suck to look STUPID on this forum day in and out.

Quote :

Edit: Yes I am editing this in. Deal with it NY! I just checked the post in question. There is no "Last edited by Forgiveness Man" that I can see visible on it. Maybe I need glasses(in which case ya'll are paying for them ), but I just don't see it.

Clown, you don't have to have to see 'last edited' for you to have edited the post. That statement would appear only if you had done it numerous times. That doesn't mean you didn't do it. You are LYING.

@ Impact: At least you admit you only glanced! Does the gun comment from earlier apply here too?

@NY: I am editing this in cause you posted after I started this. I don't see any stamp for me editing the post that usually appears. Even if I did forget that I edited it and edited it in later afterall, the "raincoat" is CLEARLY visible in alan's post where the post of mine in question was quote, which I have absolutely no control over editing. So regardless of whether or not I edited it in after YOU read it, I could not possibly have edited it in AFTER his post, because it is IN his post. lol So enough with the petty insults. Edited in or not, he simply overlooked it.

Is that a fact? Numerous times? So you edited this post of yours numerous times? Hypocrite! But seriously, I am NOT lying. You are WRONG. I can't edit alan's post yet he still has "raincoat" in his quote. How? Explain! Maybe I did edit it in after YOU read it and just forgot about it, but alan still had to have had the capability of seeing it cause it's in the quoted portion of his post. How, pray tell, can I edit his posts? Am I a magician now? Well, I know a trick I am tempted to perform soon that I will enjoy.

alansmithee wrote:

I'm going to have to repeat an earlier question. While I made it clear that I respect your opinion (as much as I disagree with it) against "unnatural" contraception you still haven't made it clear why you think "raincoats" are dumb.

Morality aside, the very concept of them, just a bit laughable to me. lol

Nystyle709 wrote:

Okay, so let's say in theory my post was an edit: So what? It's irrelevant. Good grief. You edit your posts too. It still nullifies what you said.

I probably did forget that I edited it. I got more important things to remember than remembering whether or not I edited a particular post. And your response to him was still off base. The answer to his question was clearly in HIS post. So your entire comment was still wrong. Now, bye to you.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:

Okay, so let's say in theory my post was an edit:

It was.

So what? It's irrelevant. Good grief. You edit your posts too. It still nullifies what you said.

Just stop. Really, stop fucking thinking that I think it's a big deal. It DOESN'T nullify what I said because I told him that you edit your posts when you realize it doesn't make sense and you're going to get called out for it. It was basically sarcasm but it's still the TRUTH. You can't dispute it. Simple as that.

I probably did forget that I edited it.

No you didn't. But.......if that's your final answer........('')

I got more important things to remember than remembering whether or not I edited a particular post.

Ooooookaaaay, I see......but you remember it NOW though right? Mmmhmm. I'm glad to see that your amnesia has cleared up.

And your response to him was still off base. The answer to his question was clearly in HIS post. So your entire comment was still wrong. Now, bye to you.

Yeah, after you edited it. But I'll take your word for it and assume that you simply forgot to add the one little thing (which was the word 'raincoat' which is a nickname for 'condom' which would've made your entire tirade about the 'evils of contraception' bull because when asked, you said it doesn't make the body 'work properly' when a 'raincoat' is a form of contraception doesn't interfere which the body medically so that would've made you're theory about the 'evils of contraception' even more stupid when you decided to include it in your original statement about ALL forms of contraception being stupid. Yeah, I'm just gonna take your word for it.

^^^^I can dispute it. I have never edited my post because it doesn't make sense. I only edit my post to clarify a comment, add in something I forgot or thought of later, or to make it more compact. You're wrong, I know my motives, you don't.

I don't really remember it now. I just am not fighting you on something so trivial. And yes I did forget about it.

Actually, it wouldn't make my post bull because the context of mentioning the raincoat was mocking all the forms of birth control that there are, some of which interfere medically and some which just are absurd. Enjoy grasping at straws. There's really nothing else to say to you. Fine a new hobby.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:

^^^^I can dispute it. I have never edited my post because it doesn't make sense. I only edit my post to clarify a comment, add in something I forgot or thought of later, or to make it more compact. You're wrong, I know my motives, you don't.

I don't really remember it now. I just am not fighting you on something so trivial. And yes I did forget about it.

Actually, it wouldn't make my post bull because the context of mentioning the raincoat was mocking all the forms of birth control that there are, some of which interfere medically and some which just are absurd. Enjoy grasping at straws. There's really nothing else to say to you. Fine a new hobby.

. You got caught. That's all there is to it. Own it.

Quote :

Morality aside, the very concept of them, just a bit laughable to me. lol

FM, I'm more than willing to take your word that you didn't edit your post and that I just didn't see "raincoat" while intently looking for "condom" but now I have to ask this: When you say "morality aside" what do you mean? What are your moral objections? Do you think there is something immoral about contraception and those who use it?

^^^^By morality aside, I mean for reasons not tied to my morality about it. I've found most of my morals have fairly natural reasons backing them up and it's better to forward them to those who do not share my morality. Yes I do have moral objections to them, but since nobody here really shares my morality, I didn't feel the need to detail.

Edit in: Thanks for taking my word, BTW. I didn't really intend for you not seeing it to be that big of a deal. I just like nicknaming these things and coming up with my own "what's next" items.

Nystyle709 wrote:

. You got caught. That's all there is to it. Own it.

*sighs You're persistent in your wrongness, I will give you that.

I think some people are just against any form of birth control. Period. But I'm against children being born to parents who don't want them.

Please explain to me how the Morning After pill can be considered a form of abortion, when a child hasn't yet been conceived.

Lawdy Lord Lord Lord!