Home
Tired of paying for your birth control pills? Pretty soon, you may not have to. Contraception may wind up being covered under the new health care law. And in some (but not many) places, condoms are free. What do you think, should the government arrange for BC to be given out for free?
+7
MandyPerfumeGirl
Nystyle709
Shale
Nhaiyel
tmontyb
Forgiveness Man
Chris
11 posters
Should birth control be free?
Chris- Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
No. I think it's ridiculously dumb. I don't want my tax dollars paying for a safety net for promiscuity. If you want birth control, shell out the money.
tmontyb- …is Authorized.
Join date : 2010-08-14
Location : New York City - NoHo/East Village
Posts : 915
Rep : 37
Chris wrote:Tired of paying for your birth control pills? Pretty soon, you may not have to. Contraception may wind up being covered under the new health care law. And in some (but not many) places, condoms are free. What do you think, should the government arrange for BC to be given out for free?
I can hear it now, especially from the right.
I don't have a problem with it. Maybe it will cut down on unwanted pregnancies, which may cut down on welfare dollars being spent.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
^^^^^Giving people stuff free never makes them more responsible.
Nhaiyel- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Location : Jersey (West Orange)
Posts : 3137
Rep : 123
Not only should it be free, it damn near needs to be mandatory for a lot of people. I think birth control should be covered completely, and not just the pill either.
Shale- ...is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-09-27
Location : Miami Beach
Posts : 9699
Rep : 219
Yeah, it would be a cost effective investment. An ounce of prevention if ever there was one.
Some ppl who want & need birth control can't afford it, so it should be provided.
I live in a metropolitan area where condoms are available free from the health department (including female condoms - which are not available in drug stores). This is for disease prevention reasons, but side effects are good too.
Some ppl who want & need birth control can't afford it, so it should be provided.
I live in a metropolitan area where condoms are available free from the health department (including female condoms - which are not available in drug stores). This is for disease prevention reasons, but side effects are good too.
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
I don't have a problem with it at all.
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
Forgiveness Man wrote:No. I think it's ridiculously dumb. I don't want my tax dollars paying for a safety net for promiscuity. If you want birth control, shell out the money.
Safety net for promiscuity? BC doesn't prevent diseases.
tmontyb- …is Authorized.
Join date : 2010-08-14
Location : New York City - NoHo/East Village
Posts : 915
Rep : 37
Nystyle709 wrote:Forgiveness Man wrote:No. I think it's ridiculously dumb. I don't want my tax dollars paying for a safety net for promiscuity. If you want birth control, shell out the money.
BC doesn't prevent diseases.
I don't think that was the point, but I have no clue what birth control and promiscuity have to do with each other. If one is promiscuous, I would tend to think they'd be that way with or without it.
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
tmontyb wrote:Nystyle709 wrote:
BC doesn't prevent diseases.
I don't think that was the point, but I have no clue what birth control and promiscuity have to do with each other. If one is promiscuous, I would tend to think they'd be that way with or without it.
Yeah, but that was my point. He made a blanket statement that BC was a safety net for promiscuity since it prevents pregnancy. But getting a disease would be the bigger consequence of promiscuity and BC doesn't do anything about that. Not wanting to pregnant doesn't mean you're promiscuous. So I don't know how those too can logically correlate.
Last edited by Nystyle709 on Sun May 01, 2011 12:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
MandyPerfumeGirl- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-05-31
Location : Illinois
Posts : 1273
Rep : 26
BC should be free.
Shale- ...is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-09-27
Location : Miami Beach
Posts : 9699
Rep : 219
Nystyle709 wrote: ... Getting pregnant doesn't mean you're promiscuous. So I don't know how those too can logically correlate.
Unfortunately, logic doesn't work on dogmatic minds.
tmontyb- …is Authorized.
Join date : 2010-08-14
Location : New York City - NoHo/East Village
Posts : 915
Rep : 37
Nystyle709 wrote:tmontyb wrote:
I don't think that was the point, but I have no clue what birth control and promiscuity have to do with each other. If one is promiscuous, I would tend to think they'd be that way with or without it.
Yeah, but that was my point. He made a blanket statement that BC was a safety net for promiscuity since it prevents pregnancy. But getting a disease would be the bigger consequence of promiscuity and BC doesn't do anything about that. Not wanting to pregnant doesn't mean you're promiscuous. So I don't know how those too can logically correlate.
Yep! We are both in the same mindset on this.
tmontyb- …is Authorized.
Join date : 2010-08-14
Location : New York City - NoHo/East Village
Posts : 915
Rep : 37
Shale wrote:Nystyle709 wrote: ... Getting pregnant doesn't mean you're promiscuous. So I don't know how those too can logically correlate.
Unfortunately, logic doesn't work on dogmatic minds.
Alan Smithee- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-09-03
Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
Posts : 25792
Rep : 381
Shale wrote:
Unfortunately, logic doesn't work on dogmatic minds.
CeCe- …is a Chamber DEITY.
- Join date : 2010-06-30
Posts : 11962
Rep : 326
Absolutely. And I think the people who whine about their tax dollars fail to realize it's much more expensive to cover the cost of raising a child from birth to adulthood. Then there's the cost of the mother's pregnancy. If it's money they care about it's much more cost effective to prevent it in the first place. And no, abstinence is not a realistic option because it ain't gonna happen.
There are a lot of things I don't want my tax dollars going for too. But we're generally just SOL on that.
There are a lot of things I don't want my tax dollars going for too. But we're generally just SOL on that.
Impact- …is a Power Member.
Join date : 2010-01-31
Location : Rochester, MN
Posts : 2570
Rep : 75
Forgiveness Man wrote:No. I think it's ridiculously dumb. I don't want my tax dollars paying for a safety net for promiscuity. If you want birth control, shell out the money.
No, instead you want your tax dollars paying for babies born to welfare mothers.
JM130ELM- …is Necessary.
Join date : 2010-02-02
Location : Chicago
Posts : 661
Rep : 32
No brainer. What better way to prevent unwanted pregnancies and abortions. Less people going on stamps and welfare. It's a win-win. You would think Republicans could get on board with this.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
That's also illogical crap and a just plain cop-out.CeCe wrote: And no, abstinence is not a realistic option because it ain't gonna happen.
Birth Control should not be free or mandatory. The idea that it should is simply illogical. We're breeding a nation of irresponsible self-entitled brats who think they should have the right to do whatever they want and have it paid for. It's a lazy mentality. We live in a lazy society.
Abstinence is as realistic as not smoking or doing drugs, or surviving on a non-fast food diet. Birth Control being free is a ridiculous notion only meant to coddle irresponsible people who can't be bothered to even pay for their own "protection." Everybody wants everyone else to pay for what they "need" and contrives these absurd costs if you don't give them your money. God forbid somebody actually have the responsibility to pay for what they WANT to do. No, we gotta pay for them. It's pathetic really. We're a nation of coddlers and we wonder why our country's going down the toilet. Rather than blame lack of responsibility, we'll just blame those advocating it.
|
|
|
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
» New project
» st pattys day
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
» Red?
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
» Canned Foods
» English Muffins or Toast?