Home
The general consensus is that 'Separate but Equal,' as far as the law goes, is never actually equal. Do you agree? Is it possible that people can be legally divided into categories (with slightly adjusted privileges), and still treated with the equal respect - despite the separation?
5 posters
'Separate but Equal'
Chris- Chamber Admin.
Join date : 2010-01-30
Location : Oak Park, Michigan
Posts : 23201
Rep : 330
CeCe- …is a Chamber DEITY.
- Join date : 2010-06-30
Posts : 11962
Rep : 326
"Adjusted" privileges doesn't qualify as equal for me. We're either equal or we're not.
Forgiveness Man- …is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-06-25
Location : Chilling on your sofa
Posts : 6657
Rep : 153
Nature divides us. Clearly nature does buy into the separate, but equal notion. IMO, people aren't after equality. They are after being given something somebody else has that they want, under the guise of "equality." The modern view of "equality" has really just turned the word into another meaningless word. We got plenty of "adjusted" privileges in all walks of life that we overlook, anyway.
Last edited by Forgiveness Man on Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:37 am; edited 1 time in total
Nystyle709- ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
Join date : 2010-03-16
Location : New York
Posts : 27030
Rep : 339
No. Because then it comes into question on WHO determines who gets who adjusted privilege or who determines what's equal. Everyone has to fit in some category.
Shale- ...is a Chamber Royal.
Join date : 2010-09-27
Location : Miami Beach
Posts : 9699
Rep : 219
CeCe wrote:"Adjusted" privileges doesn't qualify as equal for me. We're either equal or we're not.
If equal then why the need for separate?
|
|
|
» NEW ADDRESS: http://conversationchamber.ipbhost.com/
» New project
» st pattys day
» White smoke signals cardinals have selected a new pope
» Red?
» Do You Look Like a Celebrity?
» Canned Foods
» English Muffins or Toast?