CC33

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

CC33


+2
Nystyle709
Chris
6 posters

    Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Chris
    Chris
    Chamber Admin.
    Chamber Admin.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-01-30
    Location : Oak Park, Michigan
    Posts : 23201
    Rep : 330

    Question Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Chris Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:24 am

    Would you support a one year waiting period for divorce?


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/delaying-divorce-to-save-marriages/2011/10/19/gIQAKh0f1L_story.html?hpid=z4

    Delaying divorce to save marriages
    By William J. Doherty and Leah Ward Sears, Published: October 20

    Conventional wisdom holds that about half of U.S. marriages end in divorce — and that most Americans wish the divorce rate were lower. Still, many are skeptical about whether we can lower the divorce rate without trapping more people in bad marriages.

    This skepticism is fueled by two common assumptions: Divorce happens only after a long process of misery and conflict; and, once couples file for divorce, they don’t entertain the idea of reconciling.

    We now know those assumptions are wrong.

    Research over the past decade has shown that a major share of divorces (50 to 66 percent, depending on the study) occur between couples who had average happiness and low levels of conflict in the years before the divorce.

    Contrary to popular belief, only a minority of divorcing couples experience high conflict and abuse during their marriages. Most divorces occur with couples who have drifted apart and handle everyday disagreements poorly. It is these “average” divorces that research shows are the most harmful to children.

    In their study documenting the difference between high conflict and average divorces, sociologists Paul Amato and Alan Booth offer this promising conclusion: “Our results suggest that divorces with the greatest potential to harm children occur in marriages that have the greatest potential for reconciliation.”

    But do any parents already in the divorce process still want to save their marriages?

    William J. Doherty and his team of researchers asked 2,500 divorcing parents in Minnesota who were well along in that process whether they were interested in services to help them reconcile. In at least 10 percent of these divorce cases, both spouses were open to efforts to reconcile — and in another 30 percent, one spouse was interested in reconciliation. Results for couples earlier in the divorce process were even more promising.

    In other words, a substantial number of today’s divorces may be preventable.

    Why does this matter?

    As a longtime jurist, Leah Ward Sears held a front-row seat in witnessing how family fragmentation affects children. She saw the overwhelming anger, depression and grief that plague children when their parents are splitting up. Her concerns grew as she also noticed links between divorce and poverty, divorce and juvenile delinquency, divorce and mental health illnesses, and even divorce and violent crimes. Even a modest reduction in divorce could benefit more than 400,000 U.S. children each year.

    Can we as a society do anything to support the marital union of these children’s parents, especially those interested in saving their marriages?

    We propose a modest reform that U.S. state legislatures can enact: the Second Chances Act, which combines a minimum, one-year waiting period for divorce with education about the option of reconciliation.

    With regard to waiting periods, there is considerable variation among states. Forty-six states have waiting periods of six months or less, including 10 states that have no waiting periods. No other Western nation has waiting periods as short as the United States. In Western Europe, three-year waiting periods are common.

    A one-year waiting period would ensure that the law is not moving couples — who are often at one of the most intense emotional periods of their lives — more rapidly toward divorce than perhaps they intended or wanted.

    Our proposal, which we plan to roll out to a few states and then pursue nationally, would also require parents of minor children considering divorce to take a short, pre-filing parenting education course. This education component, which could be completed online, would include information on reconciliation (along with resources for couples who choose to pursue that course) and information on a non-adversarial approach to divorce. Forty-six states already require some form of parenting classes for divorcing couples with minor children, although most couples take the classes well into the divorce process. Tragically, educators who teach these classes report that some parents say such things as “I wish I had known these things when we first broke up.”

    Empowering couples with this education before they divorce, combined with information about the option of reconciliation, is a win-win situation: It gives individuals a second chance for their marriages, and it gives everyone — regardless of whether they pursue reconciliation — a chance for a less adversarial divorce process.

    We are under no illusion that the Second Chances Act is a panacea for lowering divorce rates. And we are certainly not advocating keeping destructive marriages together. (Under our proposal, the waiting period can be waived if there is abuse.) But we now know that a significant number of divorces may be preventable. This modest reform could spare many couples and children the pain of an unnecessary divorce.

    William J. Doherty is a professor of family social science at the University of Minnesota and director of the Minnesota Couples on the Brink Project. Leah Ward Sears, a partner at the law firm of Schiff Hardin, was chief justice of the Georgia Supreme Court from 2005 to 2009. They are the authors of “Second Chances: A Proposal to Reduce Unnecessary Divorce.”
    Nystyle709
    Nystyle709
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Female
    Join date : 2010-03-16
    Location : New York
    Posts : 27030
    Rep : 339

    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Nystyle709 Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:29 am

    No. It should be up to the couple to decide when they want to be divorced.
    Shale
    Shale
    ...is a Chamber Royal.
    ...is a Chamber Royal.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-27
    Location : Miami Beach
    Posts : 9699
    Rep : 219

    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Shale Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:46 am

    NO!

    While it sounds like a good idea, I do not trust laws to do justice for the unusual cases. That clause for opting out in case of abuse? What is abuse? If the spouse has no bruises, broken bones or other injuries will it be hard to prove psychological abuse?

    Marriages with dependent children should have an intervention before divorce but an imposed waiting period could be real hell for the spouse and the kids in certain cases. Does the law make exception for those certain cases? Can one innumerate all those certain cases?

    As for couples without kids, there should still be a walk to the courthouse, get the paperwork recorded and sit before a judge within a month type divorces that do not cost too much. There are a lot of 'married' ppl who do not live together or even see each other but cannot afford to get divorced. This should be rectified.
    CeCe
    CeCe
    …is a Chamber DEITY.
    …is a Chamber DEITY.


    Join date : 2010-06-30
    Posts : 11962
    Rep : 326

    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by CeCe Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:55 pm

    Absolutely not! I was forced years ago under state law to have a one year legal separation before the judge would even hear it. We hadn't been together for a while but the clock didn't start ticking until the papers were signed. Absolute bullshit. If people want a divorce they should be able to get one without the hoops & special effects.
    Alan Smithee
    Alan Smithee
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.
    ...is a 20G Chamber DIETY.


    Male
    Join date : 2010-09-03
    Location : 40º44’18.33”N 73º58’31.82”W
    Posts : 25792
    Rep : 381

    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Alan Smithee Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:37 pm

    Conventional wisdom holds that about half of U.S. marriages end in divorce

    That means half end in death.

    I don't think a mandated waiting period a good idea.
    Bluesmama
    Bluesmama
    …is a Power Member.
    …is a Power Member.


    Female
    Join date : 2011-07-09
    Location : Portland “Burbs”
    Posts : 3353
    Rep : 43

    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Bluesmama Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:59 pm

    BS. Yes, marriage is a contract but it's up to the parties of that contract ~ the husband and wife ~ to break that contract, NOT a judge.

    As for staying together for the sake of the kids, I've seen it go both ways. It seemed to work for some couples but I've also known others who did damage. My sister-in-law and her husband did this, and their adult children have told us that they never understood why they just didn't divorce. It did some damage, I think.

    Sponsored content


    Question Re: Delaying divorce to save marriages

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:30 pm