Your Opinion of Premarital Sex

IMO, people who need to test the waters before marriage are dooming
themselves. If you truly love and commit to each other, you'd make the
sex work.

tmontyb wrote:
Hmmm, I wish the world worked as easily as you make it sound FM, but fact of the matter it doesn't. Been there, done that and it's not reality. Just talking from actual experience.

tmontyb wrote:^^^^^^I never said you need you needed pre-martial sex to make marriage work at all. Where did I say that? I gave a what if.......

I clearly stated that I think people should sow their oats before getting married. I'm not going to change how I feel about it.

Just saying I find it interesting that someone who has NEVER been through any of it acts as if they know it all. Again, just saying.....

Sometimes those watching the game instead of participating see the picture a little clearer.

^^^^*sighs An opinion which made a statement. lol Gotta love using technicalities to do a dance.

I was merely refuting your idea that only those with experience have the
right to speak to an issue. If what you said was true, it would apply
to everything else as well. Absolutes are absolutes, and what a good
marriage should be built on(aka, not 'testing the waters') is an
absolute.

tmontyb wrote:

Non-sequitur. You're changing the context of my response.



Again, changing the context and meaning of my response.

Alright, I said what I had to say on the subject.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:^^^^Morals are absolute, not personal.

If pre-marital sex is only immoral if you chose it to be, then the same can be said for physically harming another person. If a man likes to beat his wife, it's not moral cause he thinks it's his right(and that she deserves it).

RobbieFTW wrote:Completely untrue. Morals are individual.

Are you kidding? How does inflicting abuse on someone parallel morally with the decision to have/not have pre-marital sex? If a man likes to beats his wife, that's ILLEGAL and all there is to it. Morality is out the window at that point. Apples and oranges.

Nhaiyel wrote:
Morals are not absolute.

In the meantime, premarital sex is fine, so long as the parties involve are consenting, and no one is being hurt or deceived in the process.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:Does somebody need a lesson on the English language? I said I am not the most social of people. That doesn't mean I never socialize or even that I don't get my fair share of socialization. So maybe you're the one who needs to stop.

Impact wrote:I get a kick out of FM. So tell me guy, is masturbation wrong too?

Kral wrote:So where does the line draw even in marriage? Is it moral to have sex for purposes other than procreation? Are married couples supposed to keep the lights off? Should the woman keep her bra's on?



So silly. If some people prefer to wait until marriage, then that is their decision and it should be respected...but there is nothing wrong with any two consenting adults (married or not) having sex under ANY circumstance, so long as there is honesty and caution put into it.

Nystyle709 wrote:Ya know? He's a trip. And prob. never been any damn where.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:Well I get plenty a kick out of you and your attempts at making points too. And I don't have to probably think about where you've been. Some places aren't worth having been to.

And sorry tmonty, my posts aren't the ones babbling.

tmontyb wrote:If that what you believe then so be it.

FightSleep wrote:It's natural to have sex, it's not natural to wait until or confine it to marriage. Just be safe.

Forgiveness_Man wrote:Well I get plenty a kick out of you and your attempts at making points too.

And I don't have to probably think about where you've been. Some places aren't worth having been to.

And sorry tmonty, my posts aren't the ones babbling.

Nystyle709 wrote:Cut for space!