Guys: Cut or Uncut?

I've had this debate a couple of times with friends recently so I'm just wondering, what the majority of you guys have and which do you prefer? Circumcised or uncircumcised?

I'm uncut but I'm not gay, so other penises don't interest me.

GrayWolf wrote:I'm uncut but I'm not gay, so other penises don't interest me.

No, I meant if you chould choose to be one or the other, which one do you think is "better"?

Oh. Well then I guess I'm partial to what I am. I don't think it matters all that much, but since every male is born uncircumcised, may as well leave nature alone unless you have phimosis or tight foreskin, or something that makes the natural state an inconvenience.

I'm circumcised.

I don't care whether a guy is cut or not....I'm more concerned with him getting it up.

^
I have no preference at all when it comes to that. Couldn't care less if he's circumcised or not.

I'm circumcised and prefer it.

Nystyle709 wrote:I don't care whether a guy is cut or not....I'm more concerned with him getting it up.

I am cut but I kind of like the uncut look. I wish I would have had a choice.

I realize that I never said what I was. Well I'm not circumcised and I'm glad I'm not because for me a foreskin just feels normal, and it's hard to imagine what it'd be like if I didn't have that there, lol. But I really don't have a preference as far as what other guys are. I think circumcised penises are cool too and I like the fact that there is some variety out there and everybody doesn't just have the same thing. Although, I'm totally against infact circumcision because I think that should be an individuals choice, not the parents.

I'm cut, but I really don't see the point and would have rather my parents not done that. When my son was born, I was prepared to give a big emphatic "no" to the OB asking if we wanted him circumcised or not. He wound up not asking. The trend appears to be dying out.

I've been cut for over 50 years. Nobody consulted me. I have no other point of reference and don't worry about either way. The woman I've been monogamous with for over 30 years has never expressed a preference to me either.

Dan70 wrote:I'm circumcised and prefer it.

Why? Just curious?

I like my dick, circumcised and all. It does everything it's supposed to do....it urinates, it ejaculates and has fertilized at least 2 eggs.

To those of you who're circumcised and feel like you've been dealt a grievous injustice, would you have foreskin restoration surgery?

Foreskin Restoration strikes me as a bit extreme and something someone with an unhealthy case of penis envy would do. Once foreskin has been removed, you can't get those nerve-endings back. All they're doing is stretching whatever loose skin is left, to try and get the *look* of an uncircumcised penis; I can't help but think that damage can possibly be done from attempting such a thing, and that in the end you'll be left with a jacked up looking dick.

As a female, it doesn't matter to me either way whether the man is cut or uncut. As one of the above posters said, just as long as he can get it up!

captainbryce wrote:I've had this debate a couple of times with friends recently so I'm just wondering, what the majority of you guys have and which do you prefer? Circumcised or uncircumcised?

I'm uncut. I probably have a slight preference for uncut, just because it seems like it's more fun to play with and that's what I'm used to. Although I don't really descriminate at all but I wouldn't have my own kid circumcised unless it needed to be done.

I'm circumcised and fine with it.

I'm uncut and am glad. Circumcision is barbaric and offensive, I see zero reason why any infant boy should have part of his penis removed.

captainbryce wrote:
Why? Just curious?

I don't know. I guess I just like the aesthetic of a circumcised penis better. For me, personally. Then, depending on the penis itself, I imagine that some that are uncircumcised may not age too well. All skin wrinkles, I'd think that would include foreskin too.

I'm cut and really have no preference either way. Some uncut cocks look delicious and the extra skin is nice to play with. Some uncut cocks look disgusting, with bacterial buildup and "dick cheese" and the extra skin looking all wrinkly and shit. Some cut cocks look fresh, clean and ready. Some cut cocks look nasty with a too dark circ. scar.

The point I'm making is that it all depends on the guy!

Dan70 wrote:

I don't know. I guess I just like the aesthetic of a circumcised penis better. For me, personally. Then, depending on the penis itself, I imagine that some that are uncircumcised may not age too well. All skin wrinkles, I'd think that would include foreskin too.

So your preference is basically based soley on "looks", or what you perceive that it would look like when you are 70+ years old?

A penis can be beautiful or ugly whether its cut or not.
I think it's a pretty stupid practice, though, especially if you aren't an extremely orthodox Jew.

RobbieFTW wrote:I'm cut and really have no preference either way. Some uncut cocks look delicious and the extra skin is nice to play with. Some uncut cocks look disgusting, with bacterial buildup and "dick cheese" and the extra skin looking all wrinkly and shit. Some cut cocks look fresh, clean and ready. Some cut cocks look nasty with a too dark circ. scar.

The point I'm making is that it all depends on the guy!

No you didn't say "dick cheese".