Guys: Cut or Uncut?

Tony Marino wrote:
LOL good one!

Chris wrote:South African inmates ask for circumcision
Published: Oct. 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM

PRETORIA, South Africa, Oct. 30 (UPI) -- Authorities in South Africa say they're "overwhelmed" with the number of prisoners wanting circumcision to fight the spread of HIV.

"We've had more people wanting to be circumcised than our resources can actually manage. In fact, we're overwhelmed," South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal province Health Minister Sibongiseni Dhlomo told the BBC.

Some studies suggest circumcision can help men halve their chance of contracting the human immunodeficiency virus, which causes AIDS, and a prisoner's advocacy group supports the procedure.

South Africa's Prisoners Human Rights Organization told the BBC it welcomed the move as long as inmates were properly informed.

"It may help fight the scourge of HIV/AIDS, which appears to be spreading like wildfire in South African prisons," said Golden Miles Bhudu, a spokesman for the PHRO.

More than 10,000 men have been circumcised since the program started in April, Dhlomo said.

In South Africa, about 5.7 million people are infected with HIV, and there are about 1.4 million AIDS orphans. About 350,000 Africans died of AIDS in 2007, the report said.

wesley wrote:Why don't the inmates just ask for condoms instead? That seems a whole lot easier and more effective to prevent AIDS.

wesley wrote:

Why don't the inmates just ask for condoms instead? That seems a whole lot easier and more effective to prevent AIDS.

Chris wrote:Penn & Teller: Circumcision is BULLSH*T!

wesley wrote:Funny show!

Marc™ wrote:I like my dick, circumcised and all. It does everything it's supposed to do....it urinates, it ejaculates and has fertilized at least 2 eggs.

wesley wrote:Don't you have to use lube when you beat off though? That's what I hear a lot of circumcised guys say. I'm mean if not, that's cool but it seems like it would be more of a disadvantage (not that it's that big of a deal or anything but still).

wesley wrote:Don't you have to use lube when you beat off though? That's what I hear a lot of circumcised guys say. I'm mean if not, that's cool but it seems like it would be more of a disadvantage (not that it's that big of a deal or anything but still).

Marc™ wrote:

I don't have to....and honestly I rarely do. I prefer it dry, using lotion or whatever is annoying because it makes my dick slip out of my hands. Just a little bit of skin from around the head is removed with circumcision, the rest of the skin around the overall penis itself is still there and plenty movable enough to create the back and forth friction for aiding in climax.

wesley wrote:Don't you have to use lube when you beat off though? That's what I hear a lot of circumcised guys say. I'm mean if not, that's cool but it seems like it would be more of a disadvantage (not that it's that big of a deal or anything but still).

captainbryce wrote:Yeah, that's probably another disadvantage to not having foreskin. My roommate can't seem to believe that I jack off without using lotion, lol. Don't ask how that particular conversation came up though, lol.

Tony Marino wrote:

Im kind of curious how it came up LOL???

captainbryce wrote:Well, my friends and I talk about sex all the time. Me and my roommate were out at Target doing some shopping for the crib and he bought some lotion. So I jokingly said, "I didn't know white people used lotion" and he laughed and said that he only needed it for masturbation, lol. Thats when we got into the whole circumcised vs uncircumcised debate. It was pretty funny. During the course of several random sex talks over the years with my friends and on rare occassions of actually seeing each other naked, we are all pretty much now aware of who's cut and who's uncut.

captainbryce wrote:Here's a good question: When was the first time you guys saw one that was the 'opposite' kind that you have, and what was your reaction?

captainbryce wrote:Here's a good question: When was the first time you guys saw one that was the 'opposite' kind that you have, and what was your reaction?

Tony Marino wrote:

First time I saw an uncut dick was in a magazine and I was very intrigued by it. I thought it looked hot!!

captainbryce wrote:The first cut cock I saw was my cousins when we were about 8 and 10 years old. He used to make fun of mine and vice versa. Having known that there were "two different kind" from such a younger age, they both seemed "normal" to me and it never surprised me when I discovered some kid was cut or uncut. But I find that a lot of guys who are cut tend to be much more surprised when they see an uncut guy for some reason.

captainbryce wrote:

Tony Marino wrote:

First time I saw an uncut dick was in a magazine and I was very intrigued by it. I thought it looked hot!!

The first cut cock I saw was my cousins when we were about 8 and 10 years old. He used to make fun of mine and vice versa. Having known that there were "two different kind" from such a younger age, they both seemed "normal" to me and it never surprised me when I discovered some kid was cut or uncut. But I find that a lot of guys who are cut tend to be much more surprised when they see an uncut guy for some reason.

Chris wrote:

Same here. When my cousin and I were about nine, my parents took us to go swimming. While we showered afterward, I admit that I looked and laughed. Had never seen a hooded penis before.