Guys: Cut or Uncut?

tewaz1 wrote:A penis can be beautiful or ugly whether its cut or not.
I think it's a pretty stupid practice, though, especially if you aren't an extremely orthodox Jew.

captainbryce wrote:

I don't know that I would ever call a penis "beautiful", but in principle, I agree with you.

tewaz1 wrote:

It works out that I said it, then so you didn't have to.

Chris wrote:Foreskin Restoration strikes me as a bit extreme and something someone with an unhealthy case of penis envy would do. Once foreskin has been removed, you can't get those nerve-endings back. All they're doing is stretching whatever loose skin is left, to try and get the *look* of an uncircumcised penis; I can't help but think that damage can possibly be done from attempting such a thing, and that in the end you'll be left with a jacked up looking dick.

Springwood Slasher wrote:I'm uncut. My 2 older brothers are cut but for whatever reason by the time I came along, my parents didn't bother with it.

GrayWolf wrote:I make no judgments of other mens wanks, but I just don't see the point in circumcision unless there is a medical need. Otherwise wouldn't it sort of be like cutting off your earlobe? Why do it?

captainbryce wrote:

Chris wrote:Foreskin Restoration strikes me as a bit extreme and something someone with an unhealthy case of penis envy would do. Once foreskin has been removed, you can't get those nerve-endings back. All they're doing is stretching whatever loose skin is left, to try and get the *look* of an uncircumcised penis; I can't help but think that damage can possibly be done from attempting such a thing, and that in the end you'll be left with a jacked up looking dick.

So which one are you Chris? Forskin or against it?

Chris wrote:

I'm not especially adamant, but lean more towards for. I'm totally content with my circumcised penis, but wouldn't be hellbent on having my son snipped.

Chris wrote:

I'm not especially adamant, but lean more towards for. I'm totally content with my circumcised penis, but wouldn't be hellbent on having my son snipped.

captainbryce wrote:It's mostly done out of tradition and looks. It was so common here in the states that most people just thinks it looks better. Plus, most fathers want their boys to look like them so since they were usually circumcised they have their boys circumcised. Also, I think doctors used to say that it was harmless and beneficial so people still tend to believe that. Thats really the only reason it was ever that common.

GrayWolf wrote:

That's probably true about fathers wanting their sons to be like them. Both my parents (Mexican mom/German dad) are from family cultures that are notoriously uncircumcised. Maybe that's why I'm uncut, despite my being born in the late 70s when the practice was still overwhelmingly common in the US.

captainbryce wrote:...Well I'm not circumcised and I'm glad I'm not because for me a foreskin just feels normal, and it's hard to imagine what it'd be like if I didn't have that there, lol... Although, I'm totally against infact circumcision because I think that should be an individuals choice, not the parents.

Shale wrote:
As for the reason that white Americans were more circumcised than other nationalities, it was to discourage masturbation which was a big issue to the puritan mindset of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. [/size] [/color]

captainbryce wrote:... Apparently, everyone in Europe is uncut though.

Shale wrote:

Also, I have found that some uncut men are extremely sensitive to my gentle touch. So, it is likely there is some sensation lost when the skin is removed.

captainbryce wrote:I guess of all the penises I've seen, I'd consider mine more "beautiful" than ugly, because it's what I'm used to seeing, so I think it looks normal.

wesley wrote:

wesley wrote: